Blog Ecobraz Eigre
Which electronics recycling KPIs should sustainability managers monitor?
Introduction
Sustainability managers play a strategic role in the efficient management of electronic resources, ensuring compliance with current environmental legislation and promoting practices that minimize environmental impacts. Tracking Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) related to electronics recycling is fundamental to monitoring, evaluating and improving processes that contribute to the circular economy as established by the National Solid Waste Policy (Law No. 12.305/2010).
1. Percentage of Electronics Recycled
This KPI indicates the proportion of electronic devices reused or recycled in relation to the total equipment purchased or discarded. It is a direct indicator of commitment to sustainability and compliance with the National Solid Waste Management Information System (SINIR - sinir.gov.br).
2. Total Quantity of Electronic Waste Generated
Monitoring the volume of electronic waste generated makes it possible to assess trends in consumption and disposal, as well as subsidizing reduction strategies at source, in accordance with Law No. 12.305/2010 and related standards published on Planalto.gov.br.
3. Safe Collection Rate
Refers to the percentage of electronic waste collected properly for recycling, avoiding irregular disposal. This indicator can be monitored through partnerships aligned with entities specializing in e-waste collection - electronic scheduling.
4. Efficiency of Data Sanitization in Storage Devices
With the growing concern for information security, this KPI measures the proportion of storage devices, such as hard drives and media, that have undergone certified data destruction or sanitization processes before disposal - electronic scheduling. This ensures compliance with data protection regulations and current legislation.
5. Average Time for Processing and Recycling
This indicator quantifies the average time from the generation of electronic waste to its complete recycling or final disposal, directly impacting on the efficient management of the equipment's life cycle in accordance with CETESB regulations (cetesb.sp.gov.br).
6. Percentage of Properly Disposed of Waste
Measures the fraction of electronic waste sent to recyclers or authorized treatment units in relation to the total generated, ensuring compliance with the National Solid Waste Policy and avoiding environmental damage caused by improper disposal.
Final Thoughts
Establishing and monitoring these KPIs is essential for sustainability managers to align their practices with Brazilian legal requirements, mitigate environmental and reputational risks, and boost the circular economy in the technology sector. It should be emphasized that legal compliance strengthens institutional credibility and contributes to global sustainability goals.
ManifestTransparency & Security Manifesto
Evidence and transparency: Our ESG approach is built on traceable documentation, verifiable records and auditable operational criteria. We turn electronic waste management into operational evidence to support governance, traceability and the mitigation of environmental, documentary and corporate risks. Documentary security and compliance: Documented traceability helps reduce regulatory exposure, strengthens documentary defensibility and supports alignment with applicable environmental policies, corporate contracts and governance requirements, including national and international references relevant to supply chains. Operational costing of reverse logistics: Door-to-door collection and responsible processing of electronic waste involve relevant logistics, technical and documentary costs. For this reason, Ecobraz structures transparent operational costing models linked to reverse logistics execution, with no promise of financial return, investment or asset appreciation. Governance: Operational execution is guided by compliance, traceability and verifiable documentation criteria. The priority is to strengthen the client’s corporate evidence, reduce documentary gaps and support safer, more responsible and defensible disposal decisions.
Deixe um comentário
O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *