Blog Ecobraz Eigre
The Impact of the Informal Market on the Administrative Responsibility of Large Companies
Introduction
The informal market exerts a significant influence on the administrative responsibility of large organizations, especially regarding environmental, fiscal, and labor compliance practices. Irregular activities through this market can entail legal and reputational risks, in addition to compromising compliance with existing regulations, as provided for in Law No. 12,846/2013 (Anti-Corruption Law) and Decree No. 10,937/2022.
Legal and Regulatory Context
Law No. 12,846/2013 assigns strict liability to large corporations for harmful acts committed against the public administration, including practices involving the informal market as a vector of illegality. Furthermore, Decree No. 10,937/2022 details procedures for investigation and administrative sanctions, reinforcing organizations' commitment to compliance.
In the environmental realm, Law No. 12,305/2010, which establishes the National Solid Waste Policy, imposes shared responsibility among generators, distributors, and consumers for the proper management and disposal of waste, hindering informal practices that circumvent official collection and treatment systems. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in fines, administrative sanctions, and damage to institutional reputation.
Informal Market and Its Implications
Indirect participation or inadvertent supply to the informal market amplifies large organizations' exposure to administrative risks, such as:
- Fines and penalties: citations resulting from non-compliance with fiscal, environmental, and labor legislation;
- Loss of certifications: compliance with international standards, such as ISO 14001, may be compromised;
- Civil and criminal liability: in cases of serious environmental violations, there is a possibility of civil and criminal liability for managers;
- Reputational damage: association with illegal practices negatively affects relationships with stakeholders.
Proper Collection and Disposal of Electronic Waste
An essential practice to mitigate risks involved with the informal market is the strict control of the electronic waste collection and disposal process. The electronic waste policy must be aligned with the national system regulated by SINIR (National Information System for Solid Waste Management), according to CONAMA Resolution No. 401/2008 and CONAMA Resolution No. 428/2010, ensuring traceability and environmentally appropriate final disposal.
Secure Sanitization of Media and Hard Drives
To prevent data leakage and minimize legal risks, secure sanitization of media and hard drives is recommended, a methodology that ensures the definitive destruction of information contained in electronic devices, in accordance with current legislation and best information security practices. This practice is aligned with the General Data Protection Law (LGPD - Law No. 13,709/2018), which imposes responsibility on the controller for the proper handling of personal data.
Internal Control and Auditing
Strengthening internal controls and conducting periodic audits is imperative to avoid indirect links with the informal market. Implementing integrated compliance systems, with supplier records and final disposal documentation, helps identify risks and prevent sanctions. Adoption of international standards and frameworks, such as COBIT and NIST, also contributes to mitigating these impacts.
Conclusion
Interaction with the informal market presents substantial challenges to the administrative responsibility of large corporations, requiring rigorous compliance and management actions. Adherence to fiscal, labor, and environmental laws, combined with regulated practices of electronic waste collection and sanitization, is essential to reduce legal risks and preserve institutional integrity.
ManifestTransparency & Security Manifesto
Evidence and transparency: Our ESG approach is built on traceable documentation, verifiable records and auditable operational criteria. We turn electronic waste management into operational evidence to support governance, traceability and the mitigation of environmental, documentary and corporate risks. Documentary security and compliance: Documented traceability helps reduce regulatory exposure, strengthens documentary defensibility and supports alignment with applicable environmental policies, corporate contracts and governance requirements, including national and international references relevant to supply chains. Operational costing of reverse logistics: Door-to-door collection and responsible processing of electronic waste involve relevant logistics, technical and documentary costs. For this reason, Ecobraz structures transparent operational costing models linked to reverse logistics execution, with no promise of financial return, investment or asset appreciation. Governance: Operational execution is guided by compliance, traceability and verifiable documentation criteria. The priority is to strengthen the client’s corporate evidence, reduce documentary gaps and support safer, more responsible and defensible disposal decisions.
Deixe um comentário
O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *